Labor's Gotta Play Hardball to Win!

charleston five
Militant Protest Against Racist Cop
Attack on Bay Area Longshore Workers (October 2007).

click on photo for article

For Powerful Workers Action Against the Bosses’ War!
ILWU workers and supporters protest Taft-Hartley “slave labor” law. (October 2002). 
click on photo for article


December 2007  

Craft Divisions Endanger Labor: Build a Single Media Union

Don’t Let Writers Stand Alone – All Media Workers Should Join the WGA on Strike!

Members of Writers Guild of America - West picket Paramount film studios on first day of nation-wide
strike by TV screenwriters. Remember what happened to PATCO – all out to defend the WGA strike!
(Photo: Monica Almeida/The New York Times)

As the strike by film and television writers nears its two-month mark, the 12,000 members of the affiliated East and West Coast Writers Guild of America (WGA) have shown determination and kept up morale at picket lines and mass rallies in Los Angeles and New York. Viewer ratings for late-night TV talk shows have plummeted as audiences are subjected to endless reruns. The exodus of younger viewers from traditional TV, troubling to the advertisers who bankroll the media companies, increased as Internet versions of their favorite shows sprouted. For the first time, the writers’ action is having an impact on Hollywood glitz as the WGA announced it will picket the mid-January Golden Globe awards and refused a waiver for the late-February Academy Awards.

Yet even as “The Strike Starts to Bite” (London Independent, 19 December), the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) is refusing to bargain and marshaling forces in an attempt to break the walkout. Many writers vow they are prepared to stay out for months. Such determination is vital, but it is not enough. The question of what it will take not just to hold on but to win the strike is sharply posed.

Tina Fey of 30 Rock and formerly Saturday Night Live, on picket line next to labor's inflatable rat outside Time-Warner Center in NYC.  (Photo: Librado Romero/New York Times)

Early on in the strike, celebrities including Tina Fey, Julianne Moore, Holly Hunter, Roseanne Bar, Robin Williams, Tim Robbins and others came out to walk the line next to labor’s giant inflatable rat outside the Time Warner Center in NYC’s Columbus Circle. That was when the walkout was being dubbed a “glamour strike.” Now the media are playing up the actions of TV personalities who are despicably crossing picket lines, such as hip comedian Ellen DeGeneres (who almost immediately began scabbing on the strike by her own union) and late-late-night talk show host Carson Daly, or the big names of late-night celebrity and comedy shows including Jay Leno, Jimmy Kimmel, Conan O’Brien, Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert (all of whom are WGA members) who have announced they will become strikebreakers as of the new year. (David Letterman is still up in the air, seeking a separate deal with the Guild.)

The issue here is simple: picket lines mean don’t cross, period. Those who cross are scabs and should be treated as such.

But a dangerous second prong in the union-busting attack is the studio execs’ effort to undercut the writers by exploiting the parochial craft-union divisions that hobble white-collar and manual workers in the industry. The AMPTP, which brings together global media behemoths including Time Warner, General Electric/NBC/Universal, Viacom, Disney/ABC, News Corporation/FOX and CBS, walked out of negotiations on December 7. This was after handing the WGA negotiators an ultimatum (refused by the union) that they drop key demands over compensation in “new media” (mainly the Internet), for a portion of advertising revenue, and to represent non-union animation and “reality” TV writers. The bosses also insisted on a no-strike clause to prevent WGA members from honoring other unions’ picket lines.

As columnist Patrick Goldstein noted (“The Big Picture: The Studios Play to Win,” Los Angeles Times, 11 December), “The studios don’t want to make any concessions to the [WGA] that would set a precedent for SAG [Screen Actors Guild] negotiations.” (The SAG contract expires next June 30.) Corporate Hollywood is willing to forgo billions of dollars because the studio tops are confident that the leadership of the entertainment industry unions will turn on each other and play into the hands of Rupert Murdoch and Sumner Redstone. Instead of frittering away its limited obstruction of the profit streams flowing into the coffers of the multi-media empires by negotiating exceptions and waivers to favored hosts and producers, the WGA should make a concerted effort to broaden the strike to include all industry workers.

BFF: Comedian scabs-to-be Stephen Colbert and Jon Stewart with labor hater Rudy Giuliani.

Meanwhile, the Directors Guild, which had been holding off negotiations while the WGA strike was on, announced that it would begin negotiating its own contract with the studios by New Year’s. The industry press unanimously sees this as a move to undercut the writers. Of course, if the writers, actors and directors guild leaders actually represented the interests of their members, the beginning of directors’ and actors’ negotiations could open up a second front against the producers. But instead, they actually represent the aristocracy of highly paid stars who can be bought off with exclusive deals while many of their working (and unemployed) members struggle to make ends meet as their living standards decline. The necessary united struggle against the studio bosses will not be the result of an insider’s deal or empty gestures of official cross-guild “solidarity.”

The giant media corporations that either directly own or heavily influence the Hollywood studios are counting on riding out the strike on the strength of their global, diversified sources of income. From the printed page to Internet webcasts, from CD’s to Broadway extravaganzas, the media moguls have many reserves to draw on. (Several of these conglomerates are also major military contractors.) To win, the writers must break out of their craft union isolation and mobilize a power that can actually shut down the production process – namely, the working class. To turn the writers’ strike from a precarious middle-class craft dispute into a powerful class struggle requires a leadership with a program to unite workers against the racist, war-mongering media bosses.

Instead, from the leaders of the Writers, Actors and Directors Guilds, to the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE) and the Teamsters, a conservative labor bureaucracy stands in the way of writers and other media industry workers. The union tops are obsequiously obliging to the studio capitalists, and abhor labor solidarity to the point, in the case of IATSE president Thomas L. Short, of outright scabbing. (In addition to ridiculing the WGA in the press, Short has instructed his members to cross writers’ picket lines, as well as trying to organize a “back to work” movement.) These labor fakers are also bound to the strike-breaking Democratic Party, even as the studio bosses hired a public relations firm tied to the Democrats to package management’s insulting “final offer” as a “New Economic Partnership.”

Hall of Shame: Strikebreaker Ellen DeGeneres (a member of WGA) with Jenna Bush, on phone with her father the president, December 2007.
(Photo: Warner Brothers via AP)

A serious fight to win decent commissions for writers on Internet media, which will set the tone for upcoming negotiations with SAG, must mobilize the full workforce of the media industry, from truck drivers and stagehands to actors and writers, to tie down every tentacle of the multi-media monopoly octopus. Scab hosts and “reality” cast wranglers can limp along without union writing talent – but the sets would literally go dark without the thousands of other workers who never get top billing. The WGA should be appealing to manual workers in the media industry over the heads of their sellout union bureaucrats, demanding improved wages, benefits and job safety for blue-collar media workers. Key to winning this strike is to turn what appears as a narrow dispute over DVD residuals into a broad rebellion against the media titans.

Ultimately there should be a single union representing all workers in broadcast (TV and radio), print (newspaper and magazine) and other media, uniting manual and white-collar workers, including theater and film workers. This is far from impossible. In Germany, a media workers union (IG Medien) existed from 1989 until it fused into a broader service industry union (Ver.di) in 2001. The WGA strike could be a kick-off to organizing such a union. But that will require a conscious struggle to overcome the archaic craft-union divisions and the star-system mentality. It can begin by aggressively picketing scab talk show and “reality” TV programs.

The WGA must stand firm and mobilize its members to make an example of the hosts and showrunners who have betrayed the strike: shut them down! The WGA has criticized so-called reality shows as “non-union television,” and is demanding that reality editors and writers – yes, reality writers, who occupy the bottom rung of wages and benefits and never see their names in lights – along with animation scribes, be covered by the new contract terms. But now these low-cost shows are being used as tools for strikebreaking. (This is not new: Fox’s bottom-feeding “COPS,” a pioneer in the reality/humiliation genre, was brought in to undermine the 1988 writers’ strike.) This underscores the need to mobilize all media workers against the studio bosses who exploit them.

And while petty-bourgeois television writers are hardly a key sector of organized labor, the outcome of the WGA strike could have repercussions on the entire workers movement. Remember what happened when the AFL-CIO let PATCO go down to defeat alone in the opening days of the Reagan administration: this was the opening shot of a decade of union-busting. Bringing hundreds and thousands of union members to WGA picket lines on a daily basis in New York and Los Angeles could turn the tide of this important labor battle.

Labor needs to teach the Hollywood bosses a “reality” lesson: in the real world, nothing happens without the workers! A class-struggle leadership of the WGA would appeal to all studio workers, including the essential blue-collar workers from stagehands to truck drivers to janitorial staff, to join their struggle against the exploiting studio bosses, and would champion their demands in the process. The possibility for broader solidarity in action was hinted at when “freelance” office workers for Viacom’s MTV Networks, amounting to more than three-quarters of the staff in some departments, staged an unexpected, and successful, wildcat strike at the company’s Manhattan headquarters on December 10. But instead of the WGA mobilizing fellow workers, the AMPTP has been able to turn the grievances of some “below the line” studio employees against the writers. On December 9, hiding behind a phony “spontaneous grassroots movement” the moguls lured hundreds of out-of-work studio employees, from hairdressers to laundry workers, into joining an anti-union “strike a deal” rally in Hollywood.

The necessary step of picketing “reality” TV sets, an elementary defense of the union’s position in its contract fight, would put it on a collision course with the Democratic Party and its anti-union Taft-Hartley law – which is why the WGA leadership refuses to do it. Instead, the WGA tops look to millionaire Democratic presidential candidates like John Edwards. Instead of vainly hoping for friendly regulations from the bosses’ government, a class-struggle leadership would break with both capitalist parties and build a workers party that would spearhead bold actions like picketing the reality shows and shutting down Hollywood production! A fighting union for all workers in television and film can be built on the foundation of this kind of unity in action. n
SEP/WSWS: Scab “Socialists”

Various left-wing and self-proclaimed socialist groups have written about the writers strike, but most prominent has been the World Socialist Web Site, which runs in elections under the label of the Socialist Equality Party. Supporters of the WSWS/SEP have emerged from their usual haunts in cyberspace to leaflet the picket lines and interview strikers. Their articles have a distinctly liberal (bourgeois) cast to them, talking about the “profound social and cultural divide” supposedly revealed by the strike (December 14), flattering strikers with remarks about how “Everything that writers stand for – art, innovation, refinement and creativity – is contrary to what these modern-day robber barons [the media moguls] demand: standardization, militarization, vulgarity, appeals to the lowest common cultural denominator,” etc. As if sit-coms and late-night talk shows are all about art, innovation, refinement and creativity!

The WSWS’ solution is to raise the “the socialist demand to transform the entertainment industry into a publicly owned entity, in which all those involved in the production of art and culture participate.” So a participatory Public Broadcasting System or Canadian Film Board would now be “socialist”!!

This social-democratic nonsense is eons away from Marx, who held (in The German Ideology [1845]) that “The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force..” This is true whether we are talking about Disney’s dumbed-down Dumbo cartoons or more refined, creative and innovative productions on the Franco-German Arte TV. Conclusion: while we can and should combat the ruling-class ideology spewed out by the bourgeois media, it will take a revolution that sweeps away capitalism to fundamentally change mass culture.

The WSWS criticizes the reformist craft-union leadership of the Hollywood guilds, and makes general statements about the need for a “full mobilization of the workforce in the entertainment industry” (10 November). But amidst its pompous nostrums about the “need to consider film, television and culture generally from the broadest possible vantage point” (2 November), nowhere does this “socialist” web site call for any sort of united-front actions of the various Hollywood unions, for solidarity walkouts to lay the basis for a single media industry union – or for any concrete program at all.

This is no oversight, because for all the WSWS/SEP’s apparent eagerness to woo striking screenwriters, these fake socialists are anti-union. Earlier this fall, during the United Auto Workers (UAW) negotiations with the Big Three car companies, the WSWS (12 October) wrote: “The Socialist Equality Party would advise workers, should the UAW come to their plant, to vote to keep it out.” This is exactly what the auto bosses say!

According to the WSWS, a union “would not advance workers’ interests one iota. On the contrary, the UAW would function as a policeman for management, doing everything it could to break up solidarity among workers and resistance to the corporations.” To be sure, the bosses have not yet been convinced by the great “theoretical breakthrough” that the SEP (then the Workers League) guru David North claimed to have made in 1993 when he announced that “The invocation of definitions such as ‘workers organization’ in relation to this corrupt apparatus [the AFL-CIO] only serves to conceal its real social character and the deep-going class antagonisms between it and the working class” (The Globalization of Capitalist Production & the International Tasks of the Working Class). Yet capitalists inexplicably (for the WSWS) keep firing, arresting, beating up and gunning down activists seeking to organize labor unions. Stupid bosses, if only they had read North’s disquisition, they would realize that, lo and behold, they should be supporting unions instead of trying to break them!

The Northites gratuitously confound the unions, mass defensive organizations of the working class, with the parasitical pro-capitalist bureaucracy that sits atop them, disciplining and betraying their own members in the interests of “cooperation” with management. While revolutionaries fight to oust the sellout labor fakers, they defend the unions against the capitalists and their state. This requires a dialectical understanding of the contradictory character of these organizations.

Tellingly, the Workers League/SEP/WSWS declared that labor unions are not workers organizations just at the point when capitalist counterrevolution dismembered and destroyed the Soviet Union. The great Russian revolutionary Leon Trotsky analyzed the USSR under Stalin as a bureaucratically degenerated workers state, which Trotskyists defended against imperialism while calling for a proletarian political revolution to oust the Stalinist misleaders whose quest for “peaceful coexistence” with the imperialists threatened the very survival of the workers state. North & Co. used a world-historic defeat for the proletariat to elaborate a defeatist program.

Today the WSWS argues that “globalization” has made the national-reformist oriented trade unions incapable of putting up a serious struggle against multinational corporations. Long before the current crop of reformists awoke to another century of imperialism, squinted their eyes in addled shock and named this new (to them) phenomenon “globalization,” a previous generation had drawn the same erroneous conclusions about reactionary-led trade unions.

In 1920, Dutch ultra-leftist Anton Pannekoek wrote: “The trade-union officials collaborate with the state bureaucracy not only in using their power to hold down the working class on behalf of capital, but also in the fact that their ‘policy’ increasingly amounts to deceiving the masses by demagogic means and securing their consent to the bargains that the unions have made with the capitalists” (World Revolution and Communist Tactics). In his pamphlet, Left-Wing Communism, an Infantile Disorder (1920), Lenin fiercely opposed the pseudo-revolutionary phrases that concealed an abstention from the struggle against the pro-capitalist trade-union bureaucracy.

But the WSWS cybernauts are no ultralefts. Far from it. While German and Dutch “council communists” like Pannekoek rejected participation in trade unions and bourgeois parliamentary elections, the “SEP” is a façade that exists solely for electoral purposes. And while the “infantile” radicals Lenin polemicized against mistakenly refused to wage battle in reformist-led unions to drive out the sellout misleaders, North’s senile scab “socialists” join with the bosses in trying to keep out unions.

Back when it called itself the Workers League, in the 1970s this outfit supported the “strikes” of police “unions.” In the “’80s, the WL cheered on Polish Solidarność, the company union of the Vatican and the CIA. Having stood shoulder to shoulder with the labor bureaucracy in the service of U.S. imperialism, in its latest incarnation the WSWS/SEP gives up on the unions altogether, conflating the bureaucracy that it aided with the workers organizations that it and the bureaucrats betrayed.

The Internationalist Group calls on class conscious workers to reject such counterfeit, anti-union “socialists” and fight to build a class-struggle leadership of the trade unions and a revolutionary workers party. Instead of letting one sector like the screenwriters go it alone, united action by the television, film, theater and newspaper unions can bring the communications and entertainment moguls to their knees. By inflicting a stinging defeat on the media bosses we can open the road to a socialist revolution which will for the first time make possible the unfettered flowering of the working masses’ creativity in the interests of all humanity.

Such a struggle can only be successfully spearheaded by a revolutionary workers party that is a tribune for all the oppressed, the subject nations, racial minorities and women against whom capitalist Hollywood manufactures U.S. imperialism’s war propaganda. n

To contact the League for the Fourth International or its sections, send an e-mail to: