|
. |
|
|
No. 27,
May-June 2008
Table of Contents
Selected
articles linked
|
|
Historic
ILWU Dock Workers’ Action Points the Way
May
Day Strike Against the War Shuts Down All U.S. West Coast Ports
On
May 1, every port on the West Coast of
the United States was shut down to demand an end to the U.S. war and
occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. The historic May Day walkout by the
International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) is the first time
ever that an American union has struck against a U.S. war. The union
ranks defied the rulings of an arbitrator, who twice ordered them to go
to work. They overcame the capitulations of the ILWU leadership, which
didn’t want the work stoppage in the first place, tried to water it
down and cowered before the threats of legal action while
waving
the flag. The employers’ Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) declared
the May 1 port shutdown an “illegal strike.” But after all the huffing
and puffing from the bosses’ mouthpieces, the dock workers pointed the
way to defeating the imperialist war by mobilizing working-class power.
In the end, it was more than a work stoppage. The dock workers’ May Day
strike against the war was a first step, a show of what it will take to
bring down the warmongers in Washington. Their “symbolic” action was
felt all the way to Iraq, where dock workers in two ports stopped work
in solidarity with the ILWU. But it was only a beginning. What is
needed is not only industrial action but a political offensive against
the Democrats and Republicans, the partner parties of American
imperialism, to build a class-struggle workers party.
May
Day Strike Against the War Shuts Down All U.S. West Coast Ports
(3
May 2008)
|
“Workers
Vanguard” Brings Up the Rear
The
Opportunist Left and the Port Strike Against the War: The Sound of One
Hand Clapping
On
May Day, ports up and down the
Pacific Coast were shut down by the International Longshore and
Warehouse Union (ILWU) to demand an end to “this bloody war and
occupation for imperial domination.” It is the first time ever that an
American union has taken industrial action against a U.S. war. News of
the ILWU’s strike against the war has reverberated among labor
militants internationally. While the maritime employers threatened
legal action and trade papers denounce reds under the beds, most of the
left was notably silent. The reason: they are part and parcel of the
popular-front antiwar movement, whose purpose is to
pressure the Democrats, and militant labor action gets in the way. The
Spartacist League for many years called for workers strikes against the
war, as well as “hot-cargoing”
war materiel. However, as part of
its turn from revolutionary Trotskyism to centrist opportunism, the SL
abandoned these key programmatic positions, along with its prior calls
to defeat U.S. imperialism. Meanwhile, it smears the Internationalist
Group for upholding the Trotskyist program of
workers action against
imperialist war. The
Opportunist Left and the Port Strike Against the War: The Sound of One
Hand Clapping (15
May 2008)
|
For Workers Strikes Against
the War!
Full Citizenship Rights for All Immigrants!
All
Out on May Day!
On
May 1, all 29 ports on the U.S. West Coast are to be shut down by the
International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) in protest against
the U.S.
war on Afghanistan and Iraq. This is a historic event of
international significance:
labor action against imperialist war by a major American union. The
strategically placed port workers in the ILWU can bring commerce with
Asia to a
grinding halt, and they’re about to demonstrate it. The maritime
employers are
already screaming, and you can bet it’s got the attention of the
warmongers in
Washington. All labor should take up the challenge this poses: For
workers
strikes against the war! Meanwhile, immigrants’ rights groups are once
again mobilizing on May Day. And on April 30 and May 1, the independent
truckers who move cargo to and from the docks may play an important
role in a shutdown. The imperialist war on Afghanistan and Iraq is also
a war on immigrants, minorities, working people and democratic rights
“at home.” We need to defeat this attack here and abroad, in opposition
to both the capitalist war parties. The “antiwar movement,” whose aim
has always been to pressure the Democrats, is at a dead end. What’s
needed is working-class action independent of the bosses. What that
takes is a fundamental break from the Democratic Party and the
pro-capitalist politics that infuse the labor bureaucracy.
All
Out
on May Day! (19
April 2008) |
For
Workers Strikes Against the War!
ILWU to Shut Down West Coast Ports May 1 to
Protest War
In
a major step for the U.S. labor movement, the International Longshore
and Warehouse Union (ILWU) has announced that it will shut down West
Coast ports on May 1, to demand an immediate end to the war and
occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan and the withdrawal of U.S. troops
from the Middle East. This is the first time in decades that an
American union has decided to undertake industrial action against a
U.S. war. The action announced by the powerful West Coast dock workers
union, to stop work to stop the war, should be taken up by unions and
labor organizations throughout the United States and internationally.
And the purpose of such actions should be not to beg the bourgeois
politicians whose hands are covered with blood, having voted for every
war budget for six and a half years, but a show of strength of the
working people who make this country run, and who can shut it down!
ILWU
to Shut Down West Coast Ports May 1 to Protest War (1
March 2008)
|
Why
We Fight for Workers
Strikes Against the War
(and
the
Opportunists Don't)
Break
with the Democrats
– For a Class-Struggle Workers Party!
The
U.S.’ colonial occupation of, Iraq and
Afghanistan
is at a dead end. Despite the vaunted “surge” of U.S. forces in Iraq
last
spring, attacks
by insurgents have not diminished one bit, while the number of Iraqi
civilian
casualties has sharply increased. In
the mid-term U.S. elections last
November, the Democrats won control
of both
houses of Congress mainly due to the perception that they would “do
something”
to end the war. Yet the war goes on, with their support. The
entire activity of the antiwar movement has consisted precisely of
seeking to pressure the Democratic Party into opposing the war on Iraq.
Forget it. This is a bi-partisan imperialist war. The
Internationalist Group and League for the Fourth
International call not just for U.S. withdrawal, which would merely
lead to the next war as it has repeatedly over the last century, but to
drive the imperialist occupiers out of Iraq and Afghanistan and to
defeat U.S. imperialism’s wars through international socialist
revolution. We seek to mobilize the power of the workers movement in
sharp class struggle, including workers strikes against the war and
“hot cargoing” war material. Why
We Fight for Workers Strikes Against the War (18 October 2007)
|
For Revolutionary
Defense of Cuba!
Free
the Cuban Five!
On
June 5, a federal appeals court upheld the convictions of the
“Cuban Five”: René González, Gerardo
Hernández, Ramón
Labaniño, Fernando González and Antonio
Guerrero. The
Five heroically risked their
lives to defend the Cuban Revolution against terror attacks launched
from the U.S. Prosecutors presented evidence that the five had
infiltrated counterrevolutionary
terror groups in Miami. The government
outrageously charged the defendants with “conspiracy”
to commit espionage and murder, since
there is not a shred of evidence that they commited any crime
whatsoever. Several thousand Cubans have been killed in nearly five
decades of invasions, bombings and assassinations by the U.S. and its gusano
mercenaries. The authors of the notorious 1976 bombing of a Cubana
Airlines passenger plane that killed all 73 aboard, Orlando Bosch and
Luis Posada Carriles, walk around Miami freely while the Cuban
Five have been locked up for nearly a decade. We demand the Cuban
Five be freed now, and return the U.S. naval base and torture center at
Guantánamo to Cuba! Free the
Cuban Five! (14
June 2008) |
For an
Arab-Hebrew
Workers State in a Socialist Federation of the Near East!
Defend Gaza!
Defeat
U.S./Israel War on the Palestinian
People!
Last
week, Israeli authorities ordered a halt to all imports into the Gaza
Strip. The world’s largest concentration camp was sealed off from the
outside world. The Israeli action was a heinous war crime akin to the
Nazis’ confining of Polish Jews to the Warsaw Ghetto. But the Zionist
war criminals are not acting on their own. The lockdown is part of a
U.S.-Israeli plan to punish the Gaza population for electing the
Islamic fundamentalist Hamas movement as their government. Since Hamas
won Palestinian legislative elections in January 2006, Israeli Zionists
and U.S. imperialists have been directly arming, training and
commanding key Fatah forces to wage a war on Hamas. The
Internationalist Group calls to mobilize to defeat the joint
U.S./Israeli war on the Palestinian people. While politically opposing
Islamic fundamentalism, as well as the Christian fundamentalism fueling
the U.S.’ imperialist crusade in the Near East, and theocratic states
like the Jewish state of Israel, we call for an Arab-Hebrew workers
republic as part of a socialist federation of the Near East. Defend
Gaza! Defeat U.S./Israel War on the Palestinian People! (26
January 2008)
|
Defend the
Puerto Rican
Teachers Federation!
A Case of Labor Colonialism: AFL-CIO and Change to Win vs.
the FMPR
As
the Puerto Rican Teachers Federation prepares to strike against a
virulently
anti-labor governor, braving draconian no-strike legislation, unions
affiliated with the American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial
Organizations (AFL-CIO) and the Change to Win (CTW) federation are
outrageously lining up with the bosses. This will come as no surprise
to those who know something of the sordid history of the American labor
bureaucracy in the U.S.’ Caribbean island colony, and as accomplices of
imperialist machinations throughout Latin America (and the rest of the
world). But what the labor fakers are preparing is a major betrayal of
Puerto Rican workers. The SEIU/CTW is backing a teachers “association”
that includes management, and which is preparing to scab on the strike.
In 2005 the
AFT/AFL-CIO went to the colonial courts to try to take over the FMPR. A
crucial test is shaping up in which it is urgent to defend the Puerto
Rican teachers union. The issue is posed: which side are you on? A
Case of Labor Colonialism: AFL-CIO & CTW vs. the FMPR (7
February 2008)
|
|
Federal Court
Reaffirms Frame-Up
Conviction, Orders Life Behind Bars or Racist Legal Lynching
Ruling Against Mumia Shows:
No Justice in the Capitalist Courts
Mobilize the Working Class to
Free
Mumia Abu-Jamal!
Abolish
the
Racist Death Penalty!
On
March 27, the U.S. appeals court in Philadelphia reaffirmed the
frame-up conviction of Mumia Abu-Jamal, the former Black Panther Party
spokesman and world-renowned radical journalist who has been locked up
on Pennsylvania’s death row for more than a quarter century. After
previously rejecting Mumia’s request to present evidence of his
innocence, as well as a host of issues showing that he was railroaded
by a racist court, the Court turned down Mumia’s request for a new
trial. It upheld the 2001 ruling by a federal district judge that
ordered a new hearing on the sentence, but limited the “choice” to the
living hell of life imprisonment without parole ... or execution. Mumia
is innocent. He was declared guilty and sentenced to die because of his
revolutionary politics and because for years he had been a thorn in the
side of the racist rulers of the misnamed “city of brotherly love.”
Around the world, millions have come out in defense of Jamal. This
latest ruling, like all those that preceded it, shows that the
exploited and oppressed must have no faith in the racist injustice
system. We call on the workers movement to mobilize its power to free
Mumia now! Mobilize
the Working Class to Free Mumia Abu-Jamal! (28
March 2008)
|
| 90 Years of the October Revolution
The
Russian October
Revolution of 1917 was
the seminal event of the 20th century. The workers’
conquest of power led by the Bolshevik Party of V.I. Lenin and Leon
Trotsky put an end
to World War I and shook the old
order from the imperial centers of Europe to the farthest reaches of
their
colonial “possessions.” The revolution continued to be key to world
events for the next three-quarters of a century,
long after Stalin and his bureaucratic henchmen had seized power and
betrayed the internationalist program of Red October. The
counterrevolution that destroyed the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republics along with the Soviet-bloc bureaucratically deformed workers
states during the period 1989-92 represented a world-historic defeat
for the proletariat of the entire planet. Yet contrary to the
imperialist ideologues, communism is not dead, we have not entered a
“new world order” of peace and prosperity, and we have not reached the
“end of history” – far from it. Nor, as a host of self-proclaimed
socialists declare, have we been thrown back to the period before
October. On the contrary, basing ourselves on the program and analyses
of Lenin and Trotsky, in order to lead the revolution to victory, this
time on world scale, a central task facing revolutionaries today is to
draw the lessons both of the victory of 1917 and of the defeat that
opened the post-Soviet period. 90
Years of the October Revolution (November
2007) |
Fight for
Power to
Workers and Peasants Councils!
Trotskyism vs. “Constituent Assembly” Mania
Over the last several years, calls for the establishment of a
constituent assembly have been heard in various countries of Latin
America. Around the mass strike and quasi-uprising in Oaxaca, Mexico
during May-November 2006, demands were raised by the Popular Assembly
of the Peoples of Oaxaca (APPO) and a host of left groups for a
constituent assembly, a “revolutionary constituent assembly,” etc.
Currently, “center-left” bourgeois
populist regimes led by Evo Morales in Bolivia and Rafael Correa in
Ecuador have sought to strengthen themselves against right-wing
reaction by calling constituent assemblies.
This bourgeois-democratic demand has been put forward by revolutionary
communists in fighting against a variety of pre-capitalist, colonial or
bonapartist regimes. It was one of the key planks of V.I. Lenin’s
Bolsheviks against the tsarist autocracy in Russia, until it was
superseded as the central demand by “all power to the soviets” in the
course of 1917. Trotsky raised the call for a national assembly in
China under the warlords, while emphasizing that it would only be part
of a program for the taking of power by workers and peasants councils.
But the current deluge of calls for a constituent assembly in
ostensibly bourgeois-democratic regimes is counterposed to Bolshevism.
It replaces the program of proletarian revolution with that of
(capitalist) “democracy,” a hallmark of reformist social democrats.
Trotskyism
vs. “Constituent Assembly” Mania (October
2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|